Introduction
Determining which is the right electric scooter for you has never been an easy task. It requires a lot of research about specs, prices, after-sales support and what is actually available to you. Even after compiling all the data on a bunch of different options, it can be still unclear which is the best option—it’s not necessarily the least expensive or the most powerful. All electric scooters have their pros and cons.
Wouldn’t it be nice if there was a simple metric that you could use to compare different scooters, that distilled all the attributes governing whether the product is good value for the money or not? This way you could still exclude individual products that lack “must-have” features or are simply out of your budget, but all models that make it to your shortlist can easily be arranged so the best value rises to the top.
In this article, we’ll break down the essential factors to consider when evaluating high-performance scooters, and we’ll provide our analysis of how several models measure up when considering these factors. Finally, we’ll analyze the performance of each scooter against the price, equipping you with a structured approach to finding the best value for your budget.
We felt the Teverun Blade GT+ II was a good value among mid-class, high-performance scooters, as it’s continually Super Scoots’ best sellers. But we were curious about exactly how it stacked up against the competition when analyzed in a (mostly) scientific way. So we examined several scooters comparable in price and features to the Blade GT+ II.
It should be noted that I am an independent freelance consultant, and although Super Scoots did commission this article, me and my team did our best to stay objective in our analysis.
Our Methodology
- We examined all direct name-brand competitors to the Blade GT+ II that were available in Canada. We didn’t consider any “no-name” Chinese brands that have little to no customer support or parts availability in North America. We included the Apollo Phantom 2.0, even though it’s not even available yet, mainly because it was profiled in the last article Fighter Supreme Plus vs. Apollo Phantom 2.0: Who’s the Luxury Hyperscooter King?
- For pricing, we took the current price (as of February 2025) a customer would pay, including shipping, exclusive of taxes. Where shipping was not free (only for the Evolv Pro-R V2) we used our Edmonton shipping address.
- We examined a range of attributes that are relevant to high-performance electric scooters. Because we are specifically comparing high-performance scooters, we ignored attributes like weight and folding mechanism, as one doesn’t typically purchase a high-performance scooter for portability.
- For each spec, we assigned a value from 1-10. If any spec was far and away better than the rest or as good as we could expect in 2025, we awarded a 10. All other models were rated relative to the highest-rated scooter for that attribute. This is the only area of the analysis that is not entirely scientific as the scoring is subject to opinion. If you feel differently about the scores we assigned then feel free to assign your own scores. This exercise is intended to be more of a framework that you can apply to any electric scooter model.
- Once scores for every spec for each scooter were assigned, we tallied the total score for each scooter. From there we divided the price by the “total performance score” to derive a price-performance index, a metric that can be used to easily compare the value-for-money of each of these scooters. The lower the better.
The Competitors
Here are all the electric scooters we evaluated for this article (in alphabetical order).
Apollo Phantom 2.0
- Price: $3,099.00
- URL: https://apolloscooters.ca/products/apollo-phantom-2-0
- Total score: 70
- Price-performance index: 44.3
Dualtron Victor
- Price: $3,399.00
- URL: https://www.smartwheel.ca/dualtron-victor—dual-wheel-drive-electric-scooter—2000w-dual-motor-/-1800wh-battery/
- Total score: 54
- Price-performance index: 62.9
Evolv Pro-R V2
- Price: $3,686.00
- URL: https://evolvrides.com/en-ca/products/pro-v2
- Total score: 51
- Price-performance index: 72.3
Mukata 10 Plus (25.6Ah battery version)
- Price: $2,999.00
- URL: https://www.smartwheel.ca/mukuta-10-plus-1400w-dual-motor-electric-scooter/
- Total score: 45
- Price-performance index: 66.6
Nami Klima Max 2024
- Price: $2,999.00
- URL: https://nami-electric.ca/products/nami-klima-1?variant=50447031861521
- Total score: 57
- Price-performance index: 52.6
Segway GT2
- Price: $4,499.00
- URL: https://segwaystore.ca/products/segway-superscooter-gt2
- Total score: 56
- Price-performance index: 80.3
Teverun Blade GT+ II
- Price: $3,499.00
- URL: https://superscoots.ca/product/blade-gt-plus-ii/
- Total score: 81
- Price-performance index: 43.2
Vsett 10 Apex (25.6Ah version)
- Price: $3,200.00
- URL: https://promechbc.com/product/vsett-10-apex/
- Total score: 62
- Price-performance index: 51.6
Breakdown of Scoring
Motors
Speed and acceleration are of primary importance for high-performance electric scooters. All models we looked at had dual motors, varying only by the sustained/nominal power output and peak power output. Of the two, “nominal power” is the more important one, as “peak power” is available only for short bursts (some manufacturers attempt to make their products look more powerful by making the larger peak power spec more prominent—always compare the nominal power output). Most mid-class, high-performance scooters use a 60V powertrain, but points were deducted for 52V systems as acceleration is not as robust. We did not factor in rated top speed or acceleration specs, as these depend on who is riding and in what conditions.
The Dualtron Victor earned top marks here for it’s dual 2,000W motors, the most powerful of the bunch. The Nami Kilma Max scored lowest for its somewhat anemic 1,000W motors. All the rest were between 1,400W and 1,560W. The Apollo Phantom 2.0 scored one point lower than the Blade GT+ II and the Vsett 10 Apex despite its 1,560W motors, versus the others’ 1,500W motors. This is only because it uses a 52V system rather the the 60V system used by Teverun and Vsett.
Battery
For scoring the battery, we looked at capacity in watt-hours, cells used (21700 cells, with a higher energy density than 18650 cells, scored higher) and cell manufacturer (South Korean cells like LG and Samsung scored higher than Chinese cells). A higher weighting was applied to capacity as this determines how far you can go on a charge, whereas the cell type and where they’re manufactured governs the battery weight, reliability and longevity (and to some extent, safety). Where the cell and cell manufacturer is not disclosed, we assumed they are Chinese 18650 cells (if a manufacturer is using the more expensive 21700 South Korean cells, why wouldn’t they state that?)
The Teverun Blade GT+ II took the crown here with a best-in-class 2100Wh of capacity, using LG/Samsung 21700 cells. The Dualtron Victor followed closely with a slightly smaller battery at 1800Wh. The Apollo Phantom was the worst, with only 1404Wh (despite using premium 21700 Samsung cells). Despite a rather middle-of-the-road battery, we awarded an extra point to the Vsett 10 Apex because the battery is removable, a feature we wish every scooter offered.
Brakes
All models (except the Apollo Phantom 2.0) use hydraulic disc brakes (thankfully!) so the only variations are brand (premium Logan brakes earned a higher score than standard Zoom or Nutt brakes) and number of pistons (4-piston brakes scored higher).
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 earned extra marks for Apollo’s excellent implementation of regenerative braking (plus its separate braking “throttle”). Despite having less-powerful drum brakes, the regen braking gives it plenty of stopping power, and requires no maintenance. The only other stand-outs included the Nami Klima Max (Logan brakes) and the Vsett 10 Apex (4-piston brakes).
Wheels and Tires
When it comes to wheels and tires on high-performance scooters, bigger is better for comfort, handling and ground clearance. Models with tubeless tires received a significantly higher score than those using tubed tires, because of the increased likelihood of pinch flats and the pain associated with replacing tubes. Extra points were awarded if they include self-healing layer inside which prevents most punctures.
The Blade GT+ II and Apollo Phantom 2.0 scored highest due to their 11″ x 4″ tubeless, self-healing tires. The Dualtron Victor, Evolv Pro-R V2 and Vsett 10 Apex scored lower due to their use of smaller 10″ x 3″ tubed tires.
Suspension
Suspension is of vital importance for a high-performance electric scooter, whether you’re riding on trails or in the city. It’s not so much the number of shocks the scooter has (as 4 smaller shocks can provide less travel than 2 larger shocks), but the size of them. Scooters with hydraulic suspension scored higher than those with just basic spring suspension, and extra points were awarded for adjustable rebound, which allows tailoring for terrain and rider weight.
All scooters we looked at used suspension on both the front and rear wheels. The Dualtron Victor is different from the rest in that it uses rubber torsion cartridge suspension rather than springs or hydraulics. While it doesn’t allow for adjusting rebound (or have any rebound dampening) most people rate this type of suspension as equal to or better than spring suspension, and it does reduce weight and eliminate maintenance, so we allowed extra points for it.
Lighting
Lighting can be considered just aesthetics, but as frequent scooter riders, we feel lighting is more about safety—being seen by cars, bikes pedestrians and other scooter riders. Therefore, the more integrated lighting the better in our eyes, and this is how we scored the scooters.
Higher scores were awarded for stem and deck strip lighting, and even more if the lighting was customizable (colours and patterns). Additional points for high-mounted, super-bright headlights. Additional points for integrated turn signals, and even more if they are high mounted or otherwise more visible than just small LEDs near the rear wheel.
The Blade GT+ II came out an easy winner here, as did the Apollo Phantom 2.0, both for the clever use of RGB LED lighting so it’s safer AND it looks cool. A close runner up was the Vsett 10 Apex which looks just as cool, but with less lighting overall, is not as safe.
Ergonomics
Ergonomics was considered because all these scooters are around CAD$3K or so…it’s a lot of moolah. If you’re paying that much for anything, it better damn well be comfortable. It seems worth factoring in things like steering dampers, display quality (size and readability), the design of the kickplate, and the way cockpit controls (your user interface) are implemented. Other aspects like locking grips, mudguard coverage, and deck size (and surface grip) contribute to ergonomics.
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 came out on top here, thanks partly to it’s industry-best implementation of turn signals. Not only are the left and right buttons placed right where you thumbs are on opposite sides of the handlebar, they are easy to press and audible so you know when they’re on without looking down. They also automatically cancel after 7 seconds or so. We wonder why every manufacturer doesn’t follow this same design. In addition, Apollo’s regen braking is by far the best implementation on any scooter and having a dedicated paddle for the brake means that 90% of the time, the disk brakes are not needed (saving a ton of wear on your pads). The Phantom Pro lost points due to the lack of steering damper (atlhough one can be added) and Apollo’s insistence that you mount your phone if you want detailed statistics shown while riding (most people won’t do that)…the built-in DOT display really only shows speed.
The silver medal goes to the Segway GT2 for its Intuitive cruise control, excellent stability without needing steering damper, and very visible large display.
Environmental Rating
More and more electric scooters are being engineered for all-weather riding. Like ergonomics, we think being able to ride whether the roads/trails are wet or not is important for scooters at this price point.
An electric scooter’s IP rating shows how well it resists dust and water ingress into internal electric components. As a reminder, the second digit concerns water ingress, which is what is most important for electric scooters. A couple years ago, the vast majority of electric scooters were rated IPx4, which is not considered suitable for riding if the roads or trails are wet at all (the occasional splash through a small puddle is probably fine). A rating of IPx5 or greater is the minimum for riding in the rain, with IPx6 eliminating all concerns of damage from even riding in a downpour (not that’s particularly safe).
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 earned top marks here for the best IP rating among all models: IP66. The Teverun Blade GT+ II and Nami Klima Max followed close behind with IP65 and IP55 respectively.
Customizability and Extensibility
Unlike people who purchase portable commuter scooters, high-performance electric scooter owners tend to like customizing their rides. Whether it’s different grips, a larger (or taller) handlebar, phone holders, extra lights, better brakes or shocks, PMT tires, or tweaking the performance through the controller’s software or a smartphone app, people like to tweak the appearance and performance to match their own preferences.
In general, the more the scooter uses standard, non-proprietary components, the more customizable it is. But the availability (and therefore cost) of add-on components also affected the score we awarded, as well as how open the manufacturer is to allowing customers to tune the controllers through software.
The Blade GT+ II came out on top for its use of non-proprietary components which can be fairly easily upgraded and and plentiful both on the Super Scoots website and various 3rd-party online stores. In addition, the amount of tweaking of the scooter’s performance available far surpasses every other model. The Dualtron Victor also scored high for many of the same reasons, plus the ability to easily swap out the rubber suspension cartridges for a softer or firmer ride.
Warranty
The warranty offered by Super Scoots on the Blade GT+ II (as well as every other scooter) is truly the best available in North America, despite multiple manufacturers all claiming theirs is the best available. It’s the only warranty that covers 100% of all components (excluding consumables like brake pads), no matter how significant or insignificant that component is, for a full year. A second year of coverage applies to key components (controller, throttle, display, frame, stem, electrical wiring and components). Apollo also offers a 2-year warranty on the Phantom 2.0, but only for specific components (for a second place win).
The Results
The Teverun Blade GT+ II had the best price-performance index, followed closely by the Apollo Phantom 2.0. The least bang-for-the-buck is the Segway GT2.
I’ve always admired the Teverun Blade family. The first scooter I rode was a Blade GT+, which I rode into the ground! Though I don’t own a second-gen Blade GT+ II, I’ve ridden one and was happy that Teverun upgraded what they did (lighting, styling) yet kept the aspects that were already great (suspension, power). I knew that the Blade GT+ II was good bang-for-the-buck, but was somewhat surprised that it came out on top! I was equally surprised that the Apollo Phantom 2.0 earned second place, as I think the perception is that Apollo scooters offer too much style and too little substance. However it looks like as long as you’re willing to give up some power and range, it looks to be a great option, once it starts shipping.
The full analysis along with all notes can be found here.
Eric Embacher
Eric is an freelance consultant to the micromobility industry, having owned, tested, researched and written about electric bikes, electric scooters and electric outboard motors since 2021. He lives in Victoria, BC, Canada.